I've been doing quite a bit of researching and thinking and stuff this week. In the last post, I submitted a video, the gist of it being that Jesus
cannot be a prophet since what he predicted did not come to pass. The maker of the video recounts the various ways that we get around the fact that the end of the world did not come to "the generation" Jesus was talking to in Luke chapter 21 and Matthew chapter 24. We are left with three options, saying it
did happen, but in a non-literal manner, push it into the future continually, or put it aside and focus on other aspects of the faith.
So, in my studies off and on over the last several months, the idea that Jesus (as portrayed in the gospels) may have not existed at all has been increasingly interesting to me. Not that
Christianity didn't exist, but the Christ that the very first Christians worshipped was not an earthly figure. This Christ was revealed to Paul from the very pages of the Old Testament.
An intriguing video series is
here. It does start out a bit confusing, but when you get to understanding what is really being said, it makes some sense in explaining why Paul is even there. Have you ever wondered that? Why after Jesus sets out his 12 that walked and talked with him personally, did we need a complete new apostle on the scene? Paul's letters were the first Christian documents, even before the gospels.